home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
-
- Network Working Group W A Simpson
- Internet Draft Daydreamer
- expires in six months April 1993
-
-
-
- Administrative Allocation of the 64-bit Number Space
-
-
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This memo is the product of the SIP Working Group of the Internet
- Engineering Task Force (IETF). Comments on this memo should be
- submitted to the sip@caldera.usc.edu mailing list.
-
- Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
-
- This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are working
- documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its Areas,
- and its Working Groups. Note that other groups may also distribute
- working documents as Internet Drafts. Internet Drafts are draft
- documents valid for a maximum of six months. Internet Drafts may be
- updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It
- is not appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or to
- cite them other than as a ``working draft'' or ``work in progress.''
- Please check the 1id-abstracts.txt listing contained in the
- internet-drafts Shadow Directories on nic.ddn.mil, nnsc.nsf.net,
- nic.nordu.net, ftp.nisc.sri.com, or munnari.oz.au to learn the
- current status of any Internet Draft.
-
- Abstract
-
- SIP uses a numbering space of 64 bits, to replace the 32 bit space
- used in the current IP. This document specifies an administrative
- allocation plan wherein the numbering space is efficiently divided
- into continents, clusters and countries.
-
- Space is reserved for end-point identifier, metropolitan and provider
- assignment schemes to exist in parallel. Special consideration is
- given to the interaction of these schemes with the inverse function
- of the domain name service.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page i]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- 1. Criteria
-
- There have been several previous plans for allocation of the 64 bit
- number space for future version of IP. Those plans have concentrated
- on one particular facet of allocation, such as ease of algorithmic
- transformation from older IP numbers, or simplicity of assignment.
- This plan is an attempt to take multiple criterion into account.
-
- This is merely a plan for allocation of the 64 bit number space in a
- rational fashion. It takes no position on such issues as provider
- versus metropolitan based aggregation, or use as end-point
- identifiers instead of reachability information. Instead, this plan
- provides the minimum level of compatibility between all such known
- plans, and contains features that should enhance the interworking of
- these different plans when simultaneously deployed.
-
-
- Administration
-
- The plan must account for ease of administration. In particular,
- the plan should allow for ease of assignment, ease of distribution
- of the database, and effects of deployment. The administrative
- organization should be the same for allocation of provider,
- metropolitan, and end-point identifiers.
-
- Allocation
-
- The plan must make efficient utilization of the numbering space.
- Each division has a potential allocation inefficiency of 1/2.
- Therefore, there should be as few levels of division as possible,
- and a firm rationale for use of each division.
-
- Access
-
- The plan must support efficient distributed access techniques. In
- particular, the number database should be partitioned such that
- access is widely distributed thoughout the network, instead of
- highly dependent on a few root servers.
-
- Aggregation
-
- The plan must support dense aggregation of the number space when
- used as provider or metropolitan based addressing.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 1]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- 2. Allocation Scheme
-
-
-
- Constraints
-
- Since the plan must support the IPAE compatibility mapping, only
- half of the numbering space is used.
-
- Of that half, only 3/4 is allocated by this plan.
-
- [Note: an earlier version of the plan used 7/8, which Steve
- Deering decided was too much. This version actually allocates
- only 21/32 of the space.]
-
- The remainder of the number space may be used as needed for
- uninhabited portions of the planet such as Antarctica, for other
- bodies within the local solar system, for intercontinental
- providers or organizations which refuse to interconnect within
- continents, clusters or countries, and for multicasting, IEEE 802
- numbers, E.164 numbers, or other special uses.
-
- Countries
-
- The basic administrative unit is the country. Past experience
- shows that political considerations often override practical
- concerns in the administration of networks. This plan seeks to
- align the practical with the political.
-
- The country is also the basic administrative unit in the DNS.
- Assignment of number space along the same structure as name space
- should greatly ease administration.
-
- This division provides the primary intersection between
- metropolitan area and end-point identifier allocation. The low-
- numbered portions of each country are intended to be assigned
- according to metropolitan area. End-point identifiers should be
- assigned from the metropolitan areas. Small regional providers
- may be assigned from the high-numbered portion of each country.
-
- There are approximately 227 assigned countries and territories.
- This table size is 2 orders of magnitude smaller than currently
- handled by IP4 world-wide.
-
- An effective aggregation scheme would result from interconnection
- of all of the networks within each country. This may be likely in
- the long term (by fiat if not for practical reasons), but is not
- required for efficient operation of this plan. Splitting each
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 2]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- country into 10 disconnected portions would still be an order of
- magnitude smaller than currently handled by IP4 world-wide.
-
- Clusters
-
- The countries are collected into clusters. Each country is joined
- with other countries which are in territorial proximity, or which
- have a preponderance of the population within geographic
- proximity, or which are connected by communications installations
- such as undersea cables, tropospheric scattering, or shared
- satellite links.
-
- This division provides the primary intersection between
- metropolitan and provider based allocation. Approximately 1/4 to
- 1/2 of the numbers in each cluster are reserved for provider based
- allocation and future expansion. This is indicated by dashes (-)
- at the end of each cluster. Large regional providers should be
- assigned from the high-numbered portion of each cluster. New
- countries may be added to the low-numbered portion of each
- cluster.
-
- There are approximately 38 clusters. This table size is another
- order of magnitude smaller than the number of countries.
-
- This division is intended to aid aggregation when the number space
- is used for addressing and routing. It is highly likely that
- those providers which are not interconnected within every country
- will have an interconnection somewhere within the cluster.
-
- This division also improves allocation density where the cluster
- contains small countries or territories.
-
- More than 1/2 of a cluster is reserved for expansion in those
- regions which are currently volatile. Future shifts in political
- boundaries due to splits and joins of various countries within the
- cluster will have minimal impact on administration, allocation and
- aggregation.
-
- Continents
-
- Clusters are naturally grouped into continents, which are
- separated by deserts, seas, oceans, and mountain ranges. There
- are 9 such natural groupings defined.
-
- In the near term, it is expected that administrative assignment
- will be made by continental level authorities. In the long term,
- this assignment authority is expected to be delegated to country
- level authorities.
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 3]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- This division is intended to be used to designate points of
- inter-continental DNS replication, to reduce such traffic over
- inter-continental links.
-
- This division may also aid aggregation when the number space is
- used for addressing and routing. Because continental groups are
- joined at fewer places, this aggregation level is insensitive to
- changes in topology within other continents.
-
- Continental aggregation may reduce the table size by 2 orders of
- magnitude when compared with the number of countries. This is
- likely to be of most benefit for mobile systems, such as amateur
- radio, and in concert with a larger table of local networks.
-
- Population
-
- Population statistics and growth rates are the only useful
- measures generally available for estimation of the future
- distribution of numbers. These statistics are available from a
- number of sources. Unfortunately, the sources provide a wide
- range of estimates for current population, and an even wider range
- for future growth. In general, the largest such estimate was
- chosen to provide sufficient long term space.
-
- However, those countries which were estimated to triple the
- current population in 32 years were allocated only twice the
- space, and those which quintuple (or more) were allocated only 4
- times the space. Countries experiencing rapid growth are less
- likely to be developing technological infrastructure in the near
- term. The IP4 compatibility region of the number space can be
- used to meet unanticipated long term needs.
-
- An estimated future population size of 8.6*10^9 needs to fit
- within 3/8 of 2^64 (6.9*10^18). This yields an initial estimate
- of 800,000,000 per person.
-
- Taking into consideration the best fit of the clusters within
- octet aligned available space yielded 2^48 (2.8*10^14) numbers for
- blocks of 400,000 population. This divides to 710,000,000 per
- person, which should be enough in the very long term.
-
- While at first glance this may appear to be 89% efficiency in
- allocation, it is noted below that the two largest countries are
- assigned only half their proper allocation. The actual efficiency
- is closer to 60%, which is still much better than the theoretical
- worst case of 12.5% for 3 divisions.
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 4]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- China and India
-
- India and China account for over half of the population of the
- planet. Since over half of the number space is already reserved,
- it proved impossible to allocate a proportionate amount to these
- countries. Currently, 2^59 (5.8*10^17) numbers are allocated for
- 1.6*10^9 persons, yielding only 360,000,000 each, which should be
- enough for the near term (tongue in cheek). In the future,
- another quarter of the number space could be allocated to these
- countries from the IP4 compatibility region.
-
- Small Countries and Territories
-
- Islands represent the opposite problem. Islands frequently have
- much fewer than 400,000 persons. Island nations and territories
- are often composed of many small islands. This leads to
- inefficiency in allocation. Therefore, small countries and
- islands are clustered with larger ones where possible, increasing
- the effective density of the space utilization.
-
- Future Expansion
-
- Someday, after the IP4 network 32-bit space has been exhausted and
- there is no need to globally route IP4 traffic, the 1-bit IP4
- compatibility prefix may be eliminated, thus adding another 2^63
- numbers (less the 2^32 permanently assigned for non-global use of
- IP4) to the 64-bit space.
-
- Bit and Octet Alignment
-
- To support efficient access and aggregation, this plan makes
- careful consideration of bit and octet alignment. Continents and
- most clusters are identified by the first octet, most countries,
- island groups and large providers by the first two octets, and all
- small countries and metropolitan areas within 3 octets.
-
- The DNS uses octet boundaries in the inverse lookup function.
- This plan provides efficient distribution of access activity world
- wide.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 5]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- 3. Allocation Plan
-
- allocation space prefix (binary)
- ----------------------------- ----- -------------------
-
- reserved for IP4 & future use 1/128 C000 0000
- reserved for future use 1/128 C000 0001
- reserved for future use 1/64 C000 001
- reserved for future use 1/32 C000 01
- reserved for future use 1/16 C000 1
- Europe 1/16 C001 0
- Middle East 1/32 C001 10
- North & Central Asia 1/32 C001 11
- South & West Asia 1/8 C010
- East Asia 1/8 C011
- Africa 1/8 C100
- North & Central America 1/16 C101 0
- South America & Carribean 1/16 C101 1
- Oceanea 1/16 C110 0
- reserved for future use 1/16 C110 1
- reserved for future use 1/16 C111 0
- reserved for future use 1/32 C111 10
- reserved for future use 1/64 C111 110
- local 1/128 C111 1110
- multicast 1/128 C111 1111
-
- C = IP4 compatibility prefix
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 6]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- 4. Allocation Table
-
- Country or Pop. (millions) growth prefix (binary)
- Territory 1992 2025 rate %
- -----------------------------------------------------------
-
- Europe C001 0
-
- Sweden 8.7 8.6 0.4 C001 0000 0000 ....
- Finland 5.0 5.1 0.3 C001 0000 0001 0...
- Norway 4.3 4.5 0.5 C001 0000 0001 1...
- Denmark 5.2 4.9 0.0 C001 0000 0010 0...
- Iceland 0.26 0.3 1.0 C001 0000 0010 1000 0... ....
- Greenland (Den) 0.057 0.08e 1.2 C001 0000 0010 1000 100. ....
- Faeroe Is. (Den) 0.048 0.06e 0.9 C001 0000 0010 1000 1010 ....
- - ---- ---- ----
- Netherlands 15.3 16.7 0.6 C001 0000 010. ....
- Belgium 9.9 10.5 0.1 C001 0000 0110 ....
- Luxembourg 0.39 0.5e 1.1 C001 0000 0111 0000 0... ....
- ---- ---- ---- ----
- United Kingdom 57.8 61.0 0.3 C001 0001 0... ....
- Ireland 3.5 5.0 -0.3 C001 0001 1000 0...
- Guernsey&Jersey(UK) 0.16 0.2e 0.8 C001 0001 1000 1000 00.. ....
- Isle of Man (UK) 0.064 <.1e 0.1 C001 0001 1000 1000 010. ....
- --- ---- ---- ----
- France 56.9 58.6 0.4 C001 0010 0... ....
- Italy 58.0 51.9? 0.2 C001 0010 1... ....
- Spain 39.3 39.3? 0.3 C001 0011 00.. ....
- Portugal 10.5 10.5 0.3 C001 0011 0100 ....
- Malta (UK) 0.36 0.4 0.8 C001 0011 0101 0000 0... ....
- Andorra 0.054 0.12e 2.4 C001 0011 0101 0000 100. ....
- Gibraltar (UK) 0.030 <.04e 0.1 C001 0011 0101 0000 1010 ....
- Monaco 0.030 0.04e 0.9 C001 0011 0101 0000 1011 ....
- San Marino 0.024 <.04 0.6 C001 0011 0101 0000 1100 ....
- Vatican City <.001 <.01e 0.0 C001 0011 0101 0000 1101 0000
- ---- ---- ---- ----
- Germany 80.6 73.7? 0.4 C001 0100 0... ....
- Austria 7.9 7.3? 0.3 C001 0100 1000 ....
- Switzerland 6.9 6.8 0.6 C001 0100 1001 ....
- Liechtenstein 0.029 <.04e 0.6 C001 0100 1010 0000 0000 ....
- --- ---- ---- ----
- Romania 23.7 25.7 0.5 C001 0101 000. ....
- Hungary 10.7 10.4 -0.1 C001 0101 0010 ....
- Bulgaria 8.9 8.9 0.2 C001 0101 0011 ....
- Yugoslavia 10.0 11.0 0.6 C001 0101 0100 ....
- Croatia 4.6 8.0e C001 0101 0101 ....
- Bosnia-Herzegovina 4.2 8.0e C001 0101 0110 ....
- Greece 10.3 10.0? 0.2 C001 0101 0111 ....
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 7]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- Albania 3.3 5.0 1.8 C001 0101 1000 0...
- Slovenia 1.9 3.0e C001 0101 1000 10..
- Macedonia 1.9 3.0e C001 0101 1000 11..
- --- ----
- Ukraine 52.1 52.9 C001 0110 0... ....
- Poland 38.4 42.7 0.1 C001 0110 10.. ....
- Czechoslovakia 15.7 17.2 0.3 C001 0110 110. ....
- Belarus 10.3 11.5 C001 0110 1110 ....
- Moldova 4.4 6.0e C001 0110 1111 0...
- C001 0110 1111 1...
- Lithuania 3.7 5.0e C001 0111 0000 0...
- Latvia 2.7 3.0e C001 0111 0000 10..
- Estonia 1.6 2.0e C001 0111 0000 11..
- ---- ----
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 8]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- Middle East C001 10
-
- Turkey 59.2 98.1 2.2 C001 1000 0... ....
- Azerbaijan 7.1 14.0e C001 1000 100. ....
- Georgia 5.5 7.0e C001 1000 1010 ....
- Armenia 3.5 7.0e C001 1000 1011 ....
- Cyprus 0.74 0.9 1.0 C001 1000 1100 000.
- - ---- ----
- Iraq 18.2 51.9 3.9 C001 1010 00.. ....
- Syria 13.7 38.7 3.8 C001 1010 01.. ....
- Jordan 3.6 9.9 4.2 C001 1010 1000 ....
- Israel 5.2 6.9 1.5 C001 1010 1001 ....
- Lebanon 3.4 4.7 1.4 C001 1010 1010 0...
- --- ----
- Saudi Arabia 17.8 47.1 4.2 C001 1011 00.. ....
- Yemen 10.4 29.9 3.2 C001 1011 010. ....
- Oman 2.1 4.8 3.5 C001 1011 0110 0...
- United Arab Emirates 2.5 14.7e 5.7 C001 1011 0110 1...
- Kuwait 2.2 3.8 3.6 C001 1011 0111 00..
- Bahrain 0.55 0.9 3.2 C001 1011 0111 0100
- Qatar 0.52 0.9 5.3 C001 1011 0111 0101
- ---- ----
-
-
- North & Central Asia C001 11
-
- Russian Fed. 149.3 170.7 C001 1100 .... ....
- - ---- ----
- Uzbekistan 21.3 43.1 C001 1110 00.. ....
- Kazakhstan 16.9 26.8 C001 1110 010. ....
- Tajikistan 5.5 10.0e C001 1110 0110 ....
- Kyrgyzstan 4.5 9.0e C001 1110 0111 ....
- Mongolia 2.3 4.8 2.7 C001 1110 1000 0...
- - ---- ----
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 9]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- South & West Asia C010
-
- India 882.6 1383.1 1.9 C010 00.. .... ....
- Pakistan 121.7 281.4 2.5 C010 010. .... ....
- Bangladesh 116.6 211.6 2.3 C010 0110 .... ....
- Iran 59.7 159.2 3.6 C010 0111 .... ....
- Afganistan 16.9 48.5 5.2 C010 1000 00.. ....
- Nepal 19.9 40.8 2.4 C010 1000 01.. ....
- Turkmenistan 3.9 8.0e C010 1000 1000 0...
- Bhutan 1.6 3.1 2.0 C010 1000 1000 10..
- --- ---- ----
- Sri Lanka 17.6 24.0 1.2 C010 1111 110. ....
- Maldives 0.23 0.4 3.7 C010 1111 1110 0000 00.. ....
- - ---- ---- ----
-
-
- East Asia C011
-
- China 1165.8 1590.8 1.6 C011 00.. .... ....
- Hong Kong (UK) 5.9 6.5 0.6 C011 0100 0000 0...
- Macau (Port) 0.45 0.6e 1.0 C011 0100 0000 1000
- -- ---- ----
- Japan 124.4 127.5 0.4 C011 100. .... ....
- Korea, South 44.3 54.8 0.8 C011 1010 0... ....
- Korea, North 22.2 32.1 1.9 C011 1010 10.. ....
- - ---- ----
- Thailand 56.8 76.4 1.4 C011 1100 0... ....
- Myanmar [Burma] 42.5 69.9 2.0 C011 1100 1... ....
- Vietnam 69.2 108.2 2.1 C011 1101 0... ....
- Cambodia 9.1 14.0 2.2 C011 1101 100. ....
- Laos 4.4 8.6 2.6 C011 1101 1010 ....
- -- ---- ----
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 10]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- Africa C100
-
- Morocco&W Sahara 26.2 43.9 2.1 C100 0000 00.. ....
- Algeria 26.0 47.1 2.5 C100 0000 01.. ....
- Tunisia 8.4 13.6 2.1 C100 0000 1000 ....
- Libya 4.5 11.5 3.0 C100 0000 1001 0...
- --- ----
- Mali 8.5 24.8 2.4 C100 0001 000. ....
- Senegal 8.0 17.0 3.1 C100 0001 001. ....
- Guinea 7.8 15.3 2.5 C100 0001 010. ....
- Sierra Leone 4.4 10.0 2.6 C100 0001 0110 ....
- Liberia 2.8 7.2 3.4 C100 0001 0111 0...
- Mauritania 2.1 5.1 3.1 C100 0001 0111 1...
- Gambia 0.90 1.9 3.1 C100 0001 1000 000.
- Guinea-Bissau 1.0 1.9 2.4 C100 0001 1000 001.
- Cape Verde 0.40 0.9 3.0 C100 0001 1000 0100
- --- ----
- Burkina Faso 9.6 23.7 3.1 C100 0010 000. ....
- Niger 8.3 21.5 3.4 C100 0010 001. ....
- Cote d'Ivoire 13.0 39.3 3.9 C100 0010 01.. ....
- Ghana 16.0 35.4 3.2 C100 0010 10.. ....
- Benin 5.0 12.6 3.3 C100 0010 1100 ....
- Togo 3.8 9.9 3.6 C100 0010 1101 ....
- - ---- ----
- Nigeria 126.1 216.2 3.0 C100 0100 .... ....
- Cameroon 12.7 36.3 2.7 C100 0101 000. ....
- Chad 5.5 13.2 2.5 C100 0101 0010 ....
- Gabon 1.1 2.9 2.2 C100 0101 0011 00..
- Equatorial Guinea 0.39 0.8 2.6 C100 0101 0011 0100
- Sao Tome&Principe 0.13 0.2 3.0 C100 0101 0011 0101 00.. ....
- St.Helena (UK) 0.007 <.01e 0.6 C100 0101 0011 0101 0100 00..
- ---- ---- ---- ----
- Zaire 37.9 98.2 3.3 C100 0110 0... ....
- Angola 8.9 24.7 2.9 C100 0110 100. ....
- Congo 2.4 6.6 3.0 C100 0110 1010 0...
- Central African Rep 3.2 7.9 2.6 C100 0110 1010 1...
- --- ----
- Egypt 57.8 103.1 2.3 C100 0111 0... ....
- Sudan 27.2 57.3 3.0 C100 0111 10.. ....
- --- ----
- Ethiopia 54.3 140.2 3.1 C100 1000 .... ....
- Somalia 8.3 18.7 3.3 C100 1001 000. ....
- Djibouti 0.36 1.1 2.6 C100 1001 0010 0...
- ---- ----
- Tanzania 27.4 77.9 3.4 C100 1010 00.. ....
- Kenya 26.2 62.3 3.6 C100 1010 01.. ....
- Uganda 19.4 49.6 3.7 C100 1010 100. ....
- Rwanda 7.9 18.8 3.8 C100 1010 101. ....
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 11]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- Burundi 5.8 13.0 3.2 C100 1010 1100 ....
- - ---- ----
- Mozambique 16.6 35.6 4.6 C100 1100 00.. ....
- Zimbabwe 10.3 22.6 C100 1100 010. ....
- Malawi 9.6 24.7 1.8 C100 1100 011. ....
- Zambia 8.4 26.3 3.5 C100 1100 100. ....
- --- ----
- Madagascar 12.6 31.7 3.2 C100 1101 000. ....
- Comoros 0.49 1.7 3.5 C100 1101 0010 000.
- Mauritius 1.1 1.4 0.8 C100 1101 0010 001.
- Reunion (Fr) 0.6 0.9 1.9 C100 1101 0010 0100
- Mayotte (Fr) 0.078 0.3e 3.9 C100 1101 0010 0101 00.. ....
- Seychelles 0.069 0.1 0.9 C100 1101 0010 0101 010. ....
- ---- ---- ---- ----
- South Africa 41.7 92.0 2.7 C100 1110 0... ....
- Transkei (SA) 4.6 17.0e 4.16 C100 1110 1000 ....
- Bophuthatswana (SA) 2.4 5.9e 2.83 C100 1110 1001 0...
- Ciskei (SA) 1.1 2.8e 2.96 C100 1110 1001 10..
- Venda (SA) 0.69 2.3e 3.83 C100 1110 1001 110.
- C100 1110 1001 111.
- Namibia 1.5 4.7 3.6 C100 1110 1010 00..
- Lesotho 1.9 4.4 2.6 C100 1110 1010 01..
- Botswana 1.4 3.4 2.7 C100 1110 1010 10..
- Swaziland 0.88 2.2 2.7 C100 1110 1010 110.
- - ---- ----
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 12]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- North & Central America C101 0
-
- United States 255.6 327.5 0.8 C101 000. .... ....
- Canada 27.4 35.0 1.1 C101 0010 00.. ....
- Bermuda (UK) 0.059 0.1e 1.5 C101 0010 0100 0000 000. ....
- St.Pierre&Miquel(Fr) 0.006 <.01e 0.4 C101 0010 0100 0000 0010 00..
- - ---- ---- ---- ----
- Mexico 90.0 143.3 2.2 C101 0100 .... ....
- Guatemala 9.7 21.7 3.0 C101 0101 000. ....
- El Salvador 5.6 11.3 2.0 C101 0101 0010 ....
- Honduras 5.5 11.5 2.9 C101 0101 0011 ....
- Nicaragua 4.1 9.2 2.8 C101 0101 0100 ....
- Costa Rica 3.2 5.2 2.5 C101 0101 0101 0...
- Panama 2.5 3.9 2.1 C101 0101 0101 10..
- Belize 0.24 0.5 3.6 C101 0101 0101 1100
- -- ---- ----
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 13]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- South America & Carribean C101 1
-
- Brazil 156.3 237.2 1.8 C101 100. .... ....
- Peru 22.5 37.4 2.0 C101 1010 00.. ....
- Ecuador 10.3 17.9 2.4 C101 1010 010. ....
- Chile 13.6 19.8 1.6 C101 1010 011. ....
- Argentina 33.1 45.5 1.1 C101 1010 10.. ....
- Bolivia 7.8 18.3 2.6 C101 1010 110. ....
- Paraguay 4.8 9.2 2.9 C101 1010 1110 ....
- Uruguay 3.1 3.7 0.6 C101 1010 1111 0...
- Falkland [Malvinas] 0.002 <.01e 0.0 C101 1010 1111 1000 0000 0000
- - ---- ---- ---- ----
- Columbia 34.3 54.2 2.1 C101 1100 00.. ....
- Venezuela 20.6 34.6 2.4 C101 1100 01.. ....
- Trinidad&Tobago 1.3 2.0 1.1 C101 1100 1000 00..
- Guyana 0.76 1.2 -0.4 C101 1100 1000 010.
- Suriname 0.40 0.7 1.4 C101 1100 1000 0110 .... ....
- French Guiana 0.11 0.3e 3.3 C101 1100 1000 0111 0... ....
- Neth. Antilles 0.19 0.2e 0.2 C101 1100 1000 0111 10.. ....
- Aruba (Neth) 0.064 0.1 0.6 C101 1100 1000 0111 110. ....
- - ---- ---- ---- ----
- Barbados 0.25 0.3 0.1 C101 1110 0000 0000 0... ....
- St.Lucia 0.16 0.2 2.2 C101 1110 0000 0000 1... ....
- St.Vincent&Grenadine 0.12 0.2 1.4 C101 1110 0000 0001 00.. ....
- Grenada 0.083 <.1 -0.4 C101 1110 0000 0001 010. ....
- C101 1110 0000 0001 011. ....
- C101 1110 0000 0001 1... ....
- Martinique (Fr) 0.35 0.5e 0.9 C101 1110 0000 0010 0... ....
- Guadeloupe (Fr) 0.34 0.4e 0.8 C101 1110 0000 0010 1... ....
- Dominica 0.087 0.1 1.7 C101 1110 0000 0011 000. ....
- Antigua&Barbuda 0.064 0.1 0.4 C101 1110 0000 0011 001. ....
- St.Kitts&Nevis 0.040 <.05e 0.4 C101 1110 0000 0011 0100 ....
- Montserrat (UK) 0.013 <.02e 1.0 C101 1110 0000 0011 0101 0...
- Anguilla (UK) 0.007 <.01e 0.6 C101 1110 0000 0011 0101 10..
- C101 1110 0000 0011 0101 11..
- British Virgin Is. 0.012 <.02e 1.1 C101 1110 0000 0011 0110 0...
- U.S.Virgin Is. 0.010 <.02e 0.7 C101 1110 0000 0011 0110 1...
- ---- ---- ---- ----
- Dominican Republic 7.5 11.4 2.4 C101 1111 0000 ....
- Haiti 6.4 13.2 2.3 C101 1111 0001 ....
- Puerto Rico (US) 3.5 4.6 0.1 C101 1111 0010 0...
- Bahamas 0.26 0.4 1.4 C101 1111 0010 1000 0... ....
- Turks&Caicos (UK) 0.010 0.02e 2.2 C101 1111 0010 1000 1000 ....
- --- ---- ---- ----
- Cuba 10.8 12.9 1.0 C101 1111 1000 ....
- Jamaica 2.5 3.5 0.9 C101 1111 1001 0...
- Cayman Is. (UK) 0.028 <.07e 4.2 C101 1111 1001 1000 000. ....
- --- ---- ---- ----
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 14]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- Oceanea C110 0
-
- Indonesia 193.5 278.2 1.8 C110 000. .... ....
- Malaysia 18.7 34.9 2.4 C110 0010 00.. ....
- Papua New Guinea 3.9 7.3 2.3 C110 0010 0100 0...
- Singapore 2.8 3.3 1.3 C110 0010 0100 10..
- Brunei 0.42 1.3e 6.3 C110 0010 0100 110.
- Solomon Is. 0.35 0.7 3.5 C110 0010 0100 1110 0... ....
- - ---- ---- ---- ----
- Philippines 63.7 100.8 2.1 C110 0100 0... ....
- Taiwan [Formosa] 20.8 25.4 1.1 C110 0100 10.. ....
- Guam (US) 0.14 0.3e 2.8 C110 0100 1100 0000 0... ....
- Micronesia 0.1 0.2e 2.5 C110 0100 1100 0000 10.. ....
- Mariana Is. (US) 0.024 0.07e 3.4 C110 0100 1100 0000 110. ....
- Palau (US) 0.015 <.02e 0.7 C110 0100 1100 0000 1110 0...
- - ---- ---- ---- ----
- Australia 17.8 23.9 1.6 C110 0110 000. ....
- New Zealand 3.4 4.1 0.4 C110 0110 0001 0...
- Fiji 0.75 1.1 0.8 C110 0110 0001 100.
- Vanautu 0.17 0.4e 3.1 C110 0110 0001 1010 0... ....
- New Caledonia (Fr) 0.17 0.3e 1.9 C110 0110 0001 1010 1... ....
- French Polynesia 0.20 0.4e 2.5 C110 0110 0001 1011 0... ....
- Western Samoa 0.19 0.4e 2.3 C110 0110 0001 1011 1... ....
- Marshall Is. 0.050 0.2e 3.9 C110 0110 0001 1100 00.. ....
- Kiribati 0.072 0.1 1.6 C110 0110 0001 1100 010. ....
- Tonga 0.1 0.1 C110 0110 0001 1100 011. ....
- American Samoa (US) 0.044 0.1e 2.9 C110 0110 0001 1100 100. ....
- Wallis&Futuna (Fr) 0.018 0.05e 3.0 C110 0110 0001 1100 1010 ....
- Nauru 0.009 <.01e 1.4 C110 0110 0001 1100 1011 00..
- Tuvalu 0.009 0.01e 1.9 C110 0110 0001 1100 1011 01..
- Pitcairn Is. (UK) <.001 <.01e 0.0 C110 0110 0001 1100 1011 1000
- -- ---- ---- ----
- (reserved) C110 0110 01.. ....
- (reserved) C110 0110 1... ....
- (reserved) C110 0111 .... ....
-
- TOTAL 5,433.5 8,569.0 227 countries & territories
-
- e : rough estimate
- C : IPv4 compatibility prefix
- --- : provider or future expansion
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 15]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
-
- References
-
- [1] "World Fact Book", Central Intelligence Agency, public affairs
- office, 1992.
-
- [2] "Background Notes", U.S. Department of State, public affairs
- office, various years.
-
-
- Acknowledgments
-
- Most of the population statistics were typed by Steve Deering.
-
- The basic design of this plan was motivated by Tony Li's paper,
- "Towards an Addressing Plan for IPv7", March 1993.
-
-
- Chair's Address
-
- The working group can be contacted via the current chairs:
-
-
-
-
-
- Author's Address
-
- Questions about this memo can also be directed to:
-
- William Allen Simpson
- Daydreamer
- Computer Systems Consulting Services
- P O Box 6205
- East Lansing, MI 48826-6205
-
- EMail: Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Simpson expires in six months [Page 16]
- DRAFT 64-bit allocation April 1993
-
-
- Table of Contents
-
-
- 1. Criteria .............................................. 1
-
- 2. Allocation Scheme ..................................... 2
-
- 3. Allocation Plan ....................................... 6
-
- 4. Allocation Table ...................................... 7
-
- SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ...................................... 16
-
- REFERENCES ................................................... 16
-
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................. 16
-
- CHAIR'S ADDRESS .............................................. 16
-
- AUTHOR'S ADDRESS ............................................. 16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
-